Computational Visibility Loss (CVL)
CVL — The degradation or complete loss of AI-mediated visibility due to representation decay, canonical drift, or platform dependency.
Description
Computational Visibility Loss occurs when assets that were once AI-discoverable become invisible due to changing representation quality, platform algorithm changes, or canonical drift. CVL is distinct from initial invisibility—it captures the loss of existing visibility over time.
Related Concepts
Related Research
Canonical Entity Infrastructure
The transition from platform-mediated to AI-mediated markets represents not merely a technological shift but a fundamental restructuring of market coordination infrastructure. As AI systems become the primary intermediaries of discovery, comparison, reasoning, and transaction coordination, the representation of market entities transforms from a content concern into an infrastructure concern. This paper introduces Canonical Entity Infrastructure (CEI) as a foundational infrastructure layer for AI-mediated markets, analogous to DNS for navigation, payment rails for settlement, identity systems for authentication, or financial clearing infrastructure for settlement coordination. We argue that when AI systems mediate economic discovery through machine reasoning, entity identity becomes infrastructure. The form, portability, verification, and governance of canonical representations determine whether entities participate in AI-mediated consideration sets. Fragmented representations create coordination failure. Representation portability becomes market power. Verification becomes a trust primitive. Canonical resolution becomes a governance issue. AI systems require authoritative machine-readable entity layers. Representation ownership becomes economically strategic.
The Zero-Click Economy
The Zero-Click Economy examines how AI-mediated discovery, selection, recommendation, verification, and action alter the transmission of economic signals from policy and demand to firms, assets, households, sectors, and jurisdictions. We introduce the Current Reporting-Period Hypothesis, which states that AI systems construct consideration sets from representations as they exist at inference time, not from the period the policy or demand signal was emitted. This creates Computational Transmission Attrition—policy or demand-induced signals may attenuate, misallocate, or leak before reaching intended economic targets. We formalize Dynamic Computational Risk as the interaction between exposure (dependence on AI-mediated allocation), technological velocity (rate of change in AI-mediated discovery), financial sensitivity (margin of capital, liquidity dependence), and adaptation capacity (speed of organizational response). The paper consolidates the Representation Economy measurement stack: Agent Readiness Index (ARI), Global Agent Readiness Index (GARI), Zero-Click Exposure Index (ZCEI), Platform Dependency Index (PDI), Computational Business Risk Index (CBRI), Dynamic Computational Risk Index (DCRI), Enterprise Adaptation Velocity Index (EAVI), Computable Asset Ratio (CAR), National Computable Economy Index (NCEI), Sovereign Adaptation Velocity Index (SAVI), and sovereign outputs including Compound Regional Adaptation Velocity Index (CRAVI), Global Computable Economy Index (GCEI), Sovereign Adaptation Gap (SAG), and Dynamic Monetary Sovereignty Risk Index (DMSRI).